YouTube TV enters the room

Just a quick thought on today’s announcement.

I think Google/YouTube is going to present some serious competition to Sony, Sling, and DirecTV Now. Google has the best engineers in the world and tons of experience with video streaming. I simply have more faith in them to execute than their legacy competitors.  And yes the Golf Channel is included.

YouTube already had a ton of great content – witness the clip above.

This new era of competing skinny bundles is going to be fun and so much better for competition. Don’t like Vue’s interface? Fine! Dump it in 30 days and try Google. Let the best bundle and interface win.


Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

How to Stream the Oscars – or NOT


Just a few thoughts as one of the most watched broadcasts of the year – the Academy Awards – is about to go live.

It seems like years ago when I first posted how ABC would not stream the real ceremony, but instead stream something else called Red Carpet. Well not much has changed. Today there is limited streaming ability. Here is what we see in San Diego:

The ABC live stream is not available in your area. We are working to add more cities and TV providers.
View current markets or be notified about availability:

Besides live streaming, the ability to view on demand, with pause/start is also very limited. That’s too bad because the Oscars would be the ideal program to view on demand. Let’s say you’re having a party and some of your guests will arrive 15 minutes late so you’d like to pause the start time. Well unless you have the traditional cable/DVR arrangement, you are out of luck with many modern streaming options, e.g. Sling, Vue, DirecTV Now etc.


I’m sure we’ll hear from Meryl tonight.

Perhaps the Oscars, like the Super Bowl, is best appreciated as a live event. If something dramatic happens, no good posting it on twitter 15 minutes later.

Streaming has evolved to become simply an alternative cable chord to the home. Meanwhile “linear TV” (live with commercials) has become almost unbearable. It is likely that  these highly valued commercials play a part in the lack of a universal streaming option.

Another factor might be trying to delay the total disintermediation of Cable. When you can get anything you want, on demand, via the internet, your local cable provider becomes purely an ISP.Cable is convenient, and right now, streaming the Oscars show, is somewhat less than convenient.

But because of the waning popularity  of “linear TV” I doubt this attempt to limit streaming will last. Let’s see what happens in 2018.

For those looking for one, here is a bootleg stream that seems to work


Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

Best Streaming Package for the Golf Channel

Since I know this site attracts cord cutters that like golf I thought this topic should be covered. Although not strictly “cord cutting”, the various new streaming bundles are cheaper than a full blown Cable subscription. If the Golf Channel is your priority, which is the best choice ? I’ll consider DirecTV Now, Sling, and Sony’s VUE.

Courtesy Golf Channel

Courtesy Golf Channel

Then after answering the golf question I’ll look at the rest of the details. Call it cord cutting analysis for  the golf-centric consumer.

According to this piece on CNET the Golf Channel is available on all three with some type of add on as follows:


AT&T DirecTV NOW  Go Big

IF you can get AT&T’s intro pricing this is only $35/month. Thereafter it can go to $60 per month.  I’ve never been a fan of anything AT&T because of customer service nightmares. Still, if you can sign up online and not have to deal with a real person maybe this works.

What else you get/don’t get: 

100+ channels
No DVR function yet.
No CBS who is apparently holding out from the service.


Sling: Sports Extra, BLUE

So if I read this right that’s Sling Blue ($25) + Sports Extra ($10) for a grand total of $35. A tie with AT&T above.


What else you get/don’t get: 

43 “live channels”.
Multiple streams. (not available on the cheaper Orange)


PlayStation Vue: Core Slim

Even though it’s “Core” this one starts at $34.99 which represents a recent price reduction probably to compete with Sling and AT&T.

What else you get/don’t get: 

60+ Channels.
Vue actually does have Cloud DVR and is also CNET’s top pick in general.
NoViacom (in case you must have the Comedy Channel).



Since we have a price tie I’d pick Vue with it’s DVR functionality. Although I’d expect DirecTV Now and Sling must have one in the works now.

Keep an eye on Google,who should be announcing their own skinny bundle streaming service someday soon.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Washington Post piece on DIRECTV NOW -“Cord Cutter’s Dream”

According to Wapo AT&T is about to launch “DIRECTV Now” at $35 per month. Quoting from the article:

“AT&T’s offering will come with roughly 100 TV channels in a “fat bundle” of both on-demand and live programming. In other words, customers will have access to what could become a robust stand-in for cable TV, for $35 a month.”

The article goes on to explain how this is a better deal than PlayStation VUE or Dish’s SLING.

What’s intriguing is that CBS won’t join the lineup. That indicates some real disruption going on.

Fierce Cable and others report a major launch event in NYC on Nov 28th. Does doing it on Cyber Monday mean they are taking orders? Also from the same Fierce Cable piece – what do you mean it won’t be availbe on Roku?

And DirecTV NOW has this skeletal website that is only taking names.


I hope that this is the beginning of a streaming Cable price war.

AT&T is about to unveil what may be the cord-cutter’s dream

Update Novo 28 12:43pm PST. Adding the YouTube Launch Event

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

Cyber Monday for Cord Cutters

In what appears to be blatant marketing (as opposed to real news), CNN posted  a piece on November 25th entitled: Amazon unveils Cyber Monday deals.  Of 9 items listed in that article, one does fall into the cord cutter world:

 I have both a Roku and a Chromecast, so I’ve never needed another way to stream. If you’ve had experience with Amazon Fire let me hear about it in the comments.


What is surprising is that the ultra-cheap original Google Chromecast seems to be gone now, and the Chromecast highlighted above is 2nd generation for around 70 bucks.  On the other hand, Amazon is now offering what looks like cheap knock-offs like this one called AnyCast.  It’s cheap but has a rating of  2 stars out of 60 – pretty terrible on Amazon.

mike mccune via flickr

mike mccune via flickr








What are other good ideas for Cord Cutters ?

If you know anyone that still doesn’t have a Netflix account, start there.

For serious wannabe cord cutters ready to swear off Cable, an antenna is still probably # 2.

For sports fans that want to reduce their cable bill, Sling TV might be a good deal.

Competing with Sling these days we also have PlayStation Vue.

If you know anyone looking for a cheap laptop, I can personally vouch for this Acer Chromebook 720, the one I’ve been using for 2 years now on this blog. I think of it as cutting the cord on Microsoft.

I’ll update here or add more deals in subsequent posts as they come along.

Update: Nov 26:1:08pm- 
Some ideas from friend Len:

Tivo for those getting an antenna: Refurbished $199.

Good old HULU.

Update Nov 29:
It appears Chromecast is no longer available on Amazon but plenty available directly from Mountain View.


Happy Holidays.

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

Cut the Cord on FM Radio: and the best inexpensive way to stream Pandora

I’ve always been a big fan of “old fashioned” RF, i.e. over the air radio. But let’s face it, FM music radio can’t compete these days with what you can get streaming. For whatever reason, FM stations insist on including more clutter than what I can get from a free Pandora link, albeit I have to pay for my WIFI.

So what’s the best solution for in-home music? I’ve looked around and wasn’t impressed by dedicated appliances for web based radios like Grace.  Why buy a dedicated device that will likely become obsolete in a year?

Still a big fan of iPhone 4s.

Still a big fan of iPhone 4s.

Thanks to the massive success of iPhone, the best solution today is a used iPhone – running WiFi only – no mobile phone account needed.

Here’s where it gets a bit calculating: Apple is not stupid. They do use a bit of planned obsolescence in their business model. So you will need an iPhone that is new enough to run the Pandora app but not so new it costs $300+

As of this writing, the sweet spot seems to be the iPhone 4s which can still run IOS 8.0, and is still supported by Pandora. My used iPhone 4S 16Gb cost me $56 on eBay. It took about 20 minutes to configure my new/used iPhone with Pandora and connect it to home audio via the aux input. (Remember to disable cellular data or your iPhone will keep trying to connect that way.)

Now as Apple rolls out iPhone 7 and IOS 10 who knows how long this setup will last. But I’ve heard of people still using their iPhone 3GS’s for Pandora. The trick is to NOT update anything. Stay tuned and let me know if you have a better solution.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

How did the Fax Machine outlive the VCR?

So this is slightly off topic. But I heard NPR on the way home today do a comedic eulogy for two pieces of technology: the Blackberry and the VCR. It seems the last maker of VCR’s is stopping production.

Incandescent Bulb by James Bowe Flickr

Incandescent Bulb by James Bowe Flickr

Well NPR did a survey and asked what other piece of technology should be vanquished? Not surprisingly the Fax machine was the number one answer.

I’m puzzled. People my age have boxes of old VHS tapes which I’ve yet to convert into some digital format. So at least there is a conceivable reason I might need a VCR. Maybe to watch an old family video before I decide to convert it for example.

Fax machines are just an extremely slow way to send an email. Bits are converted to audio signals to ride over the land line. Is there some contrarian notion that they are more secure?

When I do have to send a fax it seems like a total pain in the ass. I use the device so infrequently it’s a burden to use the menu. Do I enter 1, or 9 in front of the phone number? I can’t remember….

I’ll celebrate when the last makers of this archaic devices close the doors.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

“Golf Channel” for the Cord Cutters

Just noticed that entire broadcasts of LPGA are on YouTube. Below is one for round 1 of the US Women’s Open. I’m sure there is a lot more. Combine this with a Chromecast and get lots of free viewing – no cable required.




Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Farewell Time Warner Cable: Winners and Losers

The Charter TWC merger cleared its last legal hurdle this week when the California PUC voted to approve.  Little surprise here. If I remember right wasn’t this the same regulatory agency that did little during the energy crisis except to watch it happen?

End of an era? photo: Consumerist Dot Com on Flickr

End of an era?
photo: Consumerist Dot Com on Flickr

The bigger puzzlement is why the feds  (FCC, DOJ) seem to think this merger is such a great idea.

The basic logic of merger approval goes like this:

Creating a new cable operator with 17 million subs could stifle competition, so to fix that we’ll add some mitigating conditions. Thus we have that New Charter will wait seven years  before they can implement data caps or usage based billing. OK – we’ll see if Charter figure some other way to get around it.

But how is this merger good for the basic consumer? If holding off on data caps is the answer, than why wasn’t that rule simply put in place before?

At best, the legacy TWC customer will now see a new logo on the bill, and probably find it more difficult to deal with the customer service of a much larger company. And perhaps you can argue that the bigger company will have more resources to innovate and provide new advanced services like WiFi or streaming.

But who are the real winners here?

Certainly not the scores of TWC employees that will likely be downsized over the next couple of years. In fact Charter has already announced which TWC facilities will be closed. Can the loss of these jobs be good for the economy?

What about the basic stock holder. The TWC stock value has seen roughly a 20% increase in the last year, mostly likely driven by merger news. So if you were a major holder of that good for you. But again that might be little comfort for those out of a job.

OK so what about the C level executives like TWC’s CEO Rob Marcus?

Reports are that Rob Marcus, CEO since only 2014, will come out ahead by more than $100M. I know I’m starting to sound like Bernie Sanders here, but does this seem a little unbalanced? Hundreds, perhaps thousands will lose jobs, while the C-suite walks away with millions?

What am I missing?






Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Charter, Time Warner Cable and the Cord Cutter

Sorry I have been away so long. But I’m still here and following this story.

Stay tuned…


Charter’s $67 Billion Cable Merger Hinges on the Cord Cutters



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment