Sorry I have been away so long. But I’m still here and following this story.
Sorry I have been away so long. But I’m still here and following this story.
I use an iPhone, but I’m not an IOS devotee. About every 2 weeks I get a warning that my iPhone is not backed up to iCloud with instructions on how to do it. But I ignore this because it would require me to purchase more space from Apple.
Thanks to Google I have a free 100 GB of storage
Google Photos is an app I highly recommend and I have it on the iPhone. Google automatically backs up all photos at full resolution. The current free storage limit is 15 GB. Currently I’m right at about 15 GB but because I’m writing this post on an Acer Chromebook (purchased May 2014) Google threw in another 100 GB – free for 2 years.
What happens when my free storage deal runs out?
According to this post on OMG! CHROME! I won’t lose my data but if I want to keep using Google Drive for more photos I’ll be forced to purchase space, at the current rate of $1.99 per month for 100 GB.
That’s $24 per year for 100 GB of cloud storage or $120 per year for a full TB. For me that price is a good deal. I’m personally more fearful of losing data on some random personal hard drive than losing something in the cloud. In reality the “cloud” is probably multiple Google owned servers spread across the country. And I read very little about major hacks at Google.
Is this the best solution?
I store photos and non-sensitive data in the Google cloud. Sensitive data I keep on hard memory. But there is a whole myriad of solutions today – here’s a nice side by side chart from PC MAG.
But it’s not just which service is cheaper. There are many questions about which is more convenient/automatic, and which is most secure. I’m not sure there is any one best answer today. Ideally I’d like a cloud service that would be a complete backup of all my data, but I won’t put sensitive data in the cloud because every week we have news of a major new hack.
In any case I’d like to hear your solution. Please share in the comments below.
This post is a suggestion by Len from “The Beer’s on Comcast“. Considered a work in progress so check back for additions…
Netflix Subscription , still just $8.99 per month
ROKU Box – still one of the easier ways to get Netflix
Antenna – go with a simple indoor unit for the non techy
A cheap reliable router – I use this TP link unit , almost never needs a reset.
Start here for Netflix Christmas Movies
Start here for Amazon Prime Video Christmas Movies
A merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all of our long time subscribers.
Sorry I have been offline so long – very busy with the day job these days. Hoping to catch up in 2016….
I doubt it’s widely known that the FCC accepts comments from anyone on issues they are reviewing. (How much impact these have is probably another story).
Rumors are that Charter’s planned acquisition of Time Warner Cable is marching steadily forward , without nearly the obstacles that Comcast faced.
Many of the comments from business entities are positive, for example this one from the Dallas Regional Chamber. Not surprising that some business interests expect a bigger service provider might be of benefit.
But the more interesting ones are from Joe Citizen. My favorite is this guy in MA whose complaint centers on the bundled services the door to door sales people are pushing him to buy.
Have an opinion on comment on the merger? Post it below or if you prefer share it with the FCC.
Have you seen this? It’s kind of funny, not hugely so. But the message is so extremely hypocritical I couldn’t let it go unchallenged.
So apparently “Cable Corp” and “Cable World” are supposed to be Charter and Time Warner Cable. We only know for sure because at the end of the spot the Cable World guy says it’s “going to be fun , firing everyone.”
So what’s the problem? While it’s true that Charter is in the process of acquiring Time Warner Cable, did someone forget to tell this ad agency that AT&T recently acquired DirectTV? And that merger gives AT&T “26 million TV subscribers, making it the largest pay TV company in the country” .
The Charter/TWC deal by comparison will end up with 23 million customers.
The mocking nature of the ad is somewhat insider humor. One of the Cable Corp (TWC) guys talks about how bad Cable World (Charter) is: “that company stinks…. I used to work there”. In reality, in the small world of Cable you will find employees that have worked for several of the companies throughout their career. And some come away with opinions about one company being less well run than the other.
But back to messaging here : Charter/TWC will be just a bigger less competent company and you should “get rid of Cable…switch to DirecTV”.
DirecTV and Charter are essentially the same things – PayTV companies. That one uses coax cables and the other uses satellite dishes is of little consequence – unless you need internet. In that case DirecTV is going to somehow merge their satellite service with AT&T’s U-verse to give you both video and data. Based on my experience that customer service experience is going to be messy if not downright nightmare-ish.
But now I’m getting too technical. My main point:
DirecTV you are also a Cable/PayTV company and you just completed a major merger so your silly ad is huge hypocrisy.
While researching this post i discovered that Comcast (their TWC deal collapsed) had put out their own ad mocking AT&T/DirectTV. And their message is actually accurate, and funny:
Have you experienced the new DirecTV? Share your thoughts below:
Wow! I’ve been doing this blog since 2011 when “cord cutter” was pretty much an industry insider term. When only nerds talked about using strange set tops to get streaming content.
But when I read that Pay TV lost 566K Subs in Q2 it would seem that cord cutting is now having major impact. So significant that the Wall Street Journal is using terms like “Media Meltdown” and blaming cord cutters for the the recent decline in both the Nasdaq and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Meanwhile, check out what’s happening over at Netflix were stock gains seem to be the reverse of the trend in Cable.
But the future is still hazy. We seem to be in a time of experimentation by the content providers. Are we really going to have dozens of “mini-bundles” or “skinny-bundles” as the new Pay TV model? I agree with the article – no single mini bundle makes sense for everyone.
The ideal of course, from the consumer point of view, would be “create your own bundle, i.e. a la carte. And not only a la carte but CHEAP a la carte. If my 10 or 20 channels add up to the cost of the traditional Cable bundle then what’s the point? By the way Sony’s VUE is said to be the first offering a la carte but details are sketchy.
Maybe a la carte won’t happen. It doesn’t work for restaurants so why should it work for Pay TV.
So what’s next? If I had to bet, I’d put my money on Netflix. They already have the infrastructure and a huge growing subscriber base. I see a partnership or two on the horizon….
A commuting buddy of mine told me about his deep “admiration” for Ronda Rousey, a UFC fighter I must confess I have never heard of prior. But if Cable wants to survive in the Over the Top world – more events like this might be the key.
Ronda has been so successful that she usually finished off her opponents in 30 seconds or less. Yet people are willing to pay up to $60 for this as a pay per view. No doubt UFC will have to add lots of filler and extras to make this into an event of some reasonable length.
The viewing options for the fight – which kicks off at 7pm PDT – are many. But none of them are free.
One of the more convenient options might be this $49 deal from YouTube (embedded above).
And since it is the perfect excuse to go out tonight, my favorite is this “Find a Bar” option. It might be best to call ahead and ask what the cover charge is.
But you can also stream it to Roku, AppleTV, Android XBOX and stand alone web streaming options.
Easy to read stats courtesy of the Leichtman Research Group.
So immediately after the colossal failure of Comcast’s attempt to acquire Time Warner Cable, number four aka Charter comes along with the same idea. Well actually it was Charter’s idea originally but they had managed to insult Time Warner Cable with their low ball offer.
Will Charter be successful this time? And what if anything does this mean to cord cutters across the U.S. ?
I can tell you that mere days before the Comcast deal fell apart the industry was absolutely positive it was going through. New leadership roles had already been defined by Comcast and some people had changed jobs because they didn’t want to work for Comcast.
So this time we hear “don’t worry”, this is going to be easier. The combined companies won’t be as massive as Comcast/TWC so the Feds won’t object as strongly. I agree with the market, putting the odds at 50 50. It would be foolish not to learn from the past. And I think there is at least one Comcast (former ?) lobbyist out there that agrees. And f you find this kind of speculation entertaining, watch the stock prices of these companies as the deal comes to the expected close date. Wall Street seems to know just a bit ahead of the general public.
Meanwhile, is another Cable merger , albeit a smaller one, good for cord cutters? I doubt this one will have much impact. My own area would change from TWC to Charter (assuming they keep that name) and I’d still have U-verse, Dish and DirecTV as competition.
But since everything, I expect, will eventually be delivered via the internet (OTT) what really matters is the number of internet service providers in the world. Post Charter/TWC I’d still have two: AT&T/U-verse or Charter. That’s it really. There are no WISP‘s, or independents that I can buy internet from. Even if there were, they’d be buying their pipe from the same two big providers.
In the near future, at least, it looks like that’s where we are headed. What I’ term a “virtual duopoly”. Coke or Pepsi. Apple or Android. You will have a choice, but not a big one, and prices will stabilize. That is unless Google Fiber gets serious.